Skip to main content

THE ROLE OF MEDIA IN FANNING VIOLENCE

WHY MEDIA PARTICULARLY AUDIOVISUAL IS PREACHING DIVISION AND PLANTING HATRED.

Sometimes you wonder whether there is need for judges anymore. Why do media outlets especially audiovisual, take it upon themselves to impose their uncalled for opinions and interpretations of very volatile and sharply dividing national issues?

Television media which normally host many a bigot hardliners, contribute a lot to intolerance and negative ethnicity. These people more often that not have a predicated, calculated and skewed opinions on national issues.

As they bestow upon themselves the powers to engineer public opinion and emotions, they create toxic perceptions amongst peaceful patriotic citizens.

The media has usurped the powers vested on the rulers and are ruling us with an iron fist, allowing egocentric partisan commentators and analysts to spew their innate toxicities. The media has become an integral link in the bureaucratic networks bringing this country to the dogs.

The media should not allow self made non neutral analysts propagate their hate messages eulogized as intellectual opinions. It is their radical thoughts to which can be ascribed rapid national disintegration. Political analysts and commentators should be moderate, right at the equilibrium to set a balance that can sustain nationalism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUPREME COURT RULING

MY SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT I am not a lawyer and as such I am only qualified to render my layman’s submission to the court of public opinion, where one does not apply to be “amicus curiae.” In the court of public opinion everybody is both a lawyer and judge and so I can adduce my evidence confidently and make a ruling on my evidence. I want to usurp this opportunity to tell my one page judgment as Chief Justice David Maraga advised. The Chief Justice invited the public to read the Supreme Court judgment and subsequently make individual ruling.             Guys I tried to look at Chebukati trying by hook and crook to exonerate the commissioners from the mess and implicating the secretariat. Chebukati clarified they just assumed office a few months ago, coming into an old secretariat. Although the summary ruling of the Supreme Court judgment did not point out the culpability of the first and second respondents, my opinion is; ...

A FEW PICKS ABOUT VALENTINE AND BROKEN HEARTS.

I have been following on Valentine's day heartbreaking escapades of what sacrifices guys made for the sake of love, and am left in a reality limbo. The question that rings in my mind is is if indeed love exists? A man braced himself for a two year jail term sentence for an offence which was perpetrated by his lover. Sadly the girl who stole from her father a good amount of money went ahead to incriminate her husband after they had agreed the husband would come in to stand in for his wife in prison. By the time the guy was released from incarceration his love had left him. In a separate incidence a lady boycotted their wedding, broke a relationship two days to the wedding, fled and eloped with a white German man. It happened that two days to the wedding, one of the brides maid called the groom who was far from the wedding venue, telling him the wedding was bound not to be. The groom got concerned,,travelled down south to interrogate the issue one on one. When he found the bride,...

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada INTRODUCTION There was neither big revolution nor dependence war in the history of Canada. The Rebellion of 1837 was the first and the only one revolt with certain scale, which occupies an important position in Canada history. In The Rising in French Canada 1837 , Joseph Schull indicates that the Rebellion of 1837 is the mirror of the conflicts among developing national and political philosophy, different life styles. It’s a test for the people and leaders of the country. There were two armed uprisings of 1837 which took place in the lower and Upper Canada respectively. In the lower Canada which was ethnically heterogeneous, comprising both the French and English colonialists; the revolt was due to political ethno-exclusivity. The colonial administration treated the two factions with discrimination. It favored the English colonialists and neglected the voices of the French colonialists. However, in the Upper Canada, t...