Skip to main content

THE INTRICACIES OF PLASTIC BAN



KENYA BANNS PLASTIC PAPER BAGS
During my days in campus, Environmental Education was a basic course that was mandatory to everybody taking a science course. A common unit as it was called. The point I am struggling to drive home is about the paper bag debate. The banning of plastic bags as envisaged is more of a problem than an environmental solution. 

Although it is not a total ban, the ban will negatively affect the economy. Anonymous sources place the figure of the number of Kenyans who are going to be rendered jobless by the closure of polythene manufacturing companies to a whopping 600 000. In a country where unemployment rates are at its peak of 40% -in fact it could be twice the documented figure, retrenching over 600 000 people at once is disastrous.

The effect of this will be felt when the revenue the government collects from these people are unavailable. These people will plunge deeper into economic desert in these hard economic times. Though the environment might appear clean due to reduced nylon bags because of the reduction in the over 4000 tones monthly manufactured nylon bags, the government will lose the value added tax and income generated from its trade.

The drafters of the bill that birthed the act were a bit parochial. The problem is not the plastic or nylon single use bags, but the solid paper bag waste that pollutes the environment in general. Consequently the bill would have sought to address the problem not create more problems. The act would have addressed the pollution and disposal without banning the use. The progenitors of the bill would have thought about implementing responsible use and disposal rather than banning the product. Despite being non biodegradable, it can be recycled, used to make other products or disposed in an environmentally friendly way.

Some of these acts of parliament are a direct punishment and oppression of the poor. In such economic organization like Kenya where the poor do not participate in a functional way in driving the economy, the rich class- government included – have no sympathy with the plight of those below or on the poverty line. It is the poor who use the single plastic bags. It is them who work in the factories which manufacture the bags and in most cases it is them who directly benefit from its trade. By banning these nylon bags, the government and the rich in general are waging an economic war on the poor. It’s like bombing their ramshackle settings.

Let’s be candid here. Who uses these bags, so that they are in for it? It’s the poor. Where will the poor get the one to four million Kenya shillings fine? If you arrest a poor man and throw him in jail for one to four years for using plastic bag, are you helping this person already poor? To me this plastic paper bag thing is a conspiracy against the poor. The government is out to ensure the poor remain poor forever at whatever cost.
Until now, the implementers of this act are yet to ensure alternative carrier bags are in the market. 

What kind of strategy is that? The effective date of implementation is already here and yet alternative carriers are yet to be introduced in the market. How will the citizen transition from plastic bags when the government is affecting the law without alternative carriers? The government says they have identified forty companies to manufacture the alternative carrier bags and that they will be having an exhibition at KICC about alternative carriers made of sisal, leather, fabric etc. this would have been done several months before the effective date of the law. Even the new constitution did not take effect at the speed of lightening.

Because solid waste management is a devolved function, the governors should make sure the respective by-laws ostensibly for implementing the ban are not hastened, drastic and oppressive on the common mwananchi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A FEW PICKS ABOUT VALENTINE AND BROKEN HEARTS.

I have been following on Valentine's day heartbreaking escapades of what sacrifices guys made for the sake of love, and am left in a reality limbo. The question that rings in my mind is is if indeed love exists? A man braced himself for a two year jail term sentence for an offence which was perpetrated by his lover. Sadly the girl who stole from her father a good amount of money went ahead to incriminate her husband after they had agreed the husband would come in to stand in for his wife in prison. By the time the guy was released from incarceration his love had left him. In a separate incidence a lady boycotted their wedding, broke a relationship two days to the wedding, fled and eloped with a white German man. It happened that two days to the wedding, one of the brides maid called the groom who was far from the wedding venue, telling him the wedding was bound not to be. The groom got concerned,,travelled down south to interrogate the issue one on one. When he found the bride,...

THE STRUGGLE OF THE LUO NATION.

HOW THE LUO MANTLE NEVER SAW THE LIGHT OF DAY Although, Thomas Joseph Odhiambo Mboya was never among the Kapenguria six or the prominent Mau-mau fighters, who were passionate to defend their ancestral land to the last drop of their blood; he played the most fundamental role in the clamor for Kenya’s independence. His was an epic monumental activism that must have been the invisible force which pushed the imperialists to full conviction to relinquish African land.   The Kapenguria six were arrested by the colonial government as the luminaries of the Mau mau rebellion, and were incarcerated in Kapenguria for 9 years. Among the six was Ramogi Achieng Oneko. Who was born in Tienga village Uyoma sublocation, the year 1920. Alongside other Mau-mau fighters he is credited with the invincible feat of Kenyas independence in 1963, through his critical role in their uprising. The then prime minister, Jomo Kenyatta appointed him to the portfolio of minister for information, broadcas...

ELECTIONS ARE EVIL HENCE THE SHEDDING OF BLOOD

THE TROUBLE WITH KENYAN ELECTIONS The current legal stalemate bedeviling the country can be attributed to reluctance on the part of Kenyan institutions to adhere to the rule of law. The chief culprit is the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission and the government. Jubilee party has merged with the state so that the country is not ruled by the Jubilee government but by the Jubilee party. The party even controlling an independent IEBC This diabolic precedence started way back in 2013 when Jubilee, not in a free and fair manner, rigged their way to statehouse.   The Supreme Court then did not make satisfactory findings, though the petitioner accepted the verdict. Since then the party had been choreographing another rigging scheme. Although democracy entails the decision of the majority to prevail, Jubilee has taken advantage to exercise tyranny. The government rules its own way independent of the wishes of the people. Even annihilating and trampling the law more o...