Skip to main content

IEBC IS NOT EZRA CHILOBA AND EZRA CHILOBA IS NOT IEBC

IEBC is a constitutional independent commission. It is not synonymous to Ezra Chiloba, Tororey, Kasait, Muhati or Chebukati. These are individual Kenyans who are separate entities from the commission. You can axe the entire Secretariat which bungled our democracy and replace them with a diametrically new breed of Kenyans with integrity and still IEBC will be IEBC.

Just in case you didn't know, When the Supreme judges directed the First respondent to organize a fresh presidential election. The court by no means insinuated or implied Ezra Chiloba and his team should organize a new election. It was the IEBC not individuals. These individuals are not the IEBC though they at that time constituted it.

These individuals though make up the IEBC are not themselves IEBC. You can sack them or sideline them but IEBC still will remain functional with the new team. Am saying that these individuals are not permanently in IEBC especially when they are to take responsibility for irregularities and illegalities committed in the election process. When they go voluntarily, by dismissal or expulsion, IEBC still will be reconstituted. IEBC remains when they are gone.

A good example is former IEBC ICT manager, Christopher Chege Msando, he was gruesomely  demised by operatives yet IEBC still went ahead   with the elections he was enthusiastic to ensure were done in tandem with the prevailing laws.

Isaac Hassan was in the commission with his team. They vacated office yet the commission is still existing. The Secretariat they left was the one which over saw the recently conducted shambolic elections. The same case to Samuel Kiviutu and his commission members.

It is on this premise where one ought to delineate the IEBC as a commission from the individuals constituting the commission. If we take this to consideration then we will not bigotly hold that the supreme court judgement gave a clean bill of health to the defunct IEBC Secretariat. Defunct because they plunged the country into disarray. Now 12 billion is going to waste just because a few rogue people could not not do their job competently and with integrity. And in the midst of all this the person who bears the burden is the taxpayer. A king size amount of taxpayers money that could be used to improve lives of Kenyans is going to be used to redo a process that was ignorantly and arrogantly bungled.

The IEBC Secretariat plummeted way below the standards of moral integrity contemplated in the spirit of our constitution. They, in the words of NASA presidential flag bearer belong to jail. The country cannot lose such a collosal amount of taxpayers money just because a few individuals decided to meddle with such a critical process for selfish gains. Somebody must be held to account for the courts findings.

The verdict of the supreme court ruling did not limit the first respondent to Chiloba and his team. In a sense that they are the first respondent the court contemplated to organise a fresh election. Perhaps - as latter could arise -. The court to find the IEBC Secretariat or specific members of the Secretariat to be legible for prosecution due to their culpability in the just nullified election process.  It is the IEBC, the first respondent  to conduct elections not  Ezra Chiloba and his team who cost the country this grave loss of over 11 billion Kenya shillings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUPREME COURT RULING

MY SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT I am not a lawyer and as such I am only qualified to render my layman’s submission to the court of public opinion, where one does not apply to be “amicus curiae.” In the court of public opinion everybody is both a lawyer and judge and so I can adduce my evidence confidently and make a ruling on my evidence. I want to usurp this opportunity to tell my one page judgment as Chief Justice David Maraga advised. The Chief Justice invited the public to read the Supreme Court judgment and subsequently make individual ruling.             Guys I tried to look at Chebukati trying by hook and crook to exonerate the commissioners from the mess and implicating the secretariat. Chebukati clarified they just assumed office a few months ago, coming into an old secretariat. Although the summary ruling of the Supreme Court judgment did not point out the culpability of the first and second respondents, my opinion is; ...

A FEW PICKS ABOUT VALENTINE AND BROKEN HEARTS.

I have been following on Valentine's day heartbreaking escapades of what sacrifices guys made for the sake of love, and am left in a reality limbo. The question that rings in my mind is is if indeed love exists? A man braced himself for a two year jail term sentence for an offence which was perpetrated by his lover. Sadly the girl who stole from her father a good amount of money went ahead to incriminate her husband after they had agreed the husband would come in to stand in for his wife in prison. By the time the guy was released from incarceration his love had left him. In a separate incidence a lady boycotted their wedding, broke a relationship two days to the wedding, fled and eloped with a white German man. It happened that two days to the wedding, one of the brides maid called the groom who was far from the wedding venue, telling him the wedding was bound not to be. The groom got concerned,,travelled down south to interrogate the issue one on one. When he found the bride,...

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada INTRODUCTION There was neither big revolution nor dependence war in the history of Canada. The Rebellion of 1837 was the first and the only one revolt with certain scale, which occupies an important position in Canada history. In The Rising in French Canada 1837 , Joseph Schull indicates that the Rebellion of 1837 is the mirror of the conflicts among developing national and political philosophy, different life styles. It’s a test for the people and leaders of the country. There were two armed uprisings of 1837 which took place in the lower and Upper Canada respectively. In the lower Canada which was ethnically heterogeneous, comprising both the French and English colonialists; the revolt was due to political ethno-exclusivity. The colonial administration treated the two factions with discrimination. It favored the English colonialists and neglected the voices of the French colonialists. However, in the Upper Canada, t...