Skip to main content

WHY GIVING TITLEDEEDS DOES NOT SOLVE HISTORICAL LAND INJUSTICE

HISTORICAL LAND INJUSTICE.

Sometimes I pity the common unlearned citizens. You know how in the spiritual realms they tell you. The Devil is a lier. He comes to steal, kill and destroy. Then they postulate, the Devil will deceive you and seduce you.

I am talking about something else. Not spending my energy and bundles talking about the Devil. I hardly mention the Devil in my prayers and if unknowingly I do, then albeit once or at most twice. It is because it's a complete waste of words.

There is this dogma called, HISTORICAL INJUSTICES, particularly land injustices. When talking about historical land injustices. We are not talking about private land or individual inherited land. We are talking about communal land and public land.

Well am not writing a paper on this subject. I'm merely pointing out that historical land injustices is an elephant a queen ant cannot carry using it's limbs. You cannot solve land injustices dating to colonial era by dishing one or two titledeeds to individual land owners.

A good example is the white highlands from where fertile arable lands were designated to the white settlers and farmers. Another example is where huge chunks of land were irregularly acquired or alienated after the departure of the imperialists.

These huge blocks of land belongs to communities, who are the rightful owners. Consequently giving people their rightful and legally owned land does not constitute an attempt towards solving the land morass. Nobody should be deceived like the Devil does daily to God's children to sway them to eternal  damnation, that by spending little to obtain your legally deserved land title, you are a beneficiary of the solution to historical land injustice.

In fact, you have no problem at all, save for historical land problem. If you have already undergone the necessary procedures of getting a land title or your land has been surveyed as it behoves the government to do so, then it is not a privilege for the government to give you your title. It is now your right and an obligation of the government to expeditiously process your title. It is not a favour to the one getting the title because the land is his/ hers.

Processing titles is a function of the government so that when the president takes the title from the ministry of land and brings it to your premise instead of you going for it, it does not a mount to tackling land issue. On the opposing hand, it amounts to, abuse of office. It is not upon the president to waste valuable time taking land titles to land owners and awarding them like certificates.

So long as the TJRC report on land is not implemented, Kenyans will have to wait for a new Dawn of responsible governance. Leaders with good will to settle historical oppression once for all. So that the beautiful country can move forward united in love, peace and harmony.

Although historical land injustices is a hot potato. The potato must be eaten. Ask me "Jakabondo" how to eat a hot potato, it's as easy as abc. No matter how hot, you can still eat it.

The secret to eating a hot potato is simple. You place it in your mouth, Suspend it in a manner it does not hit the corners of your mouth. Then from inside exhale  air and blow onto the potato, allowing the warm air to escape your mouth.

I mean land is sharply divisive but it urgently required redress to pave way for forging ahead. Giving of Title deeds by the president does not arrest the land problem. It does not even touch it. It is just PR where " Rais anajisusha kufanya kazi ya watu wake wa mkono."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SUPREME COURT RULING

MY SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT I am not a lawyer and as such I am only qualified to render my layman’s submission to the court of public opinion, where one does not apply to be “amicus curiae.” In the court of public opinion everybody is both a lawyer and judge and so I can adduce my evidence confidently and make a ruling on my evidence. I want to usurp this opportunity to tell my one page judgment as Chief Justice David Maraga advised. The Chief Justice invited the public to read the Supreme Court judgment and subsequently make individual ruling.             Guys I tried to look at Chebukati trying by hook and crook to exonerate the commissioners from the mess and implicating the secretariat. Chebukati clarified they just assumed office a few months ago, coming into an old secretariat. Although the summary ruling of the Supreme Court judgment did not point out the culpability of the first and second respondents, my opinion is; ...

A FEW PICKS ABOUT VALENTINE AND BROKEN HEARTS.

I have been following on Valentine's day heartbreaking escapades of what sacrifices guys made for the sake of love, and am left in a reality limbo. The question that rings in my mind is is if indeed love exists? A man braced himself for a two year jail term sentence for an offence which was perpetrated by his lover. Sadly the girl who stole from her father a good amount of money went ahead to incriminate her husband after they had agreed the husband would come in to stand in for his wife in prison. By the time the guy was released from incarceration his love had left him. In a separate incidence a lady boycotted their wedding, broke a relationship two days to the wedding, fled and eloped with a white German man. It happened that two days to the wedding, one of the brides maid called the groom who was far from the wedding venue, telling him the wedding was bound not to be. The groom got concerned,,travelled down south to interrogate the issue one on one. When he found the bride,...

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada INTRODUCTION There was neither big revolution nor dependence war in the history of Canada. The Rebellion of 1837 was the first and the only one revolt with certain scale, which occupies an important position in Canada history. In The Rising in French Canada 1837 , Joseph Schull indicates that the Rebellion of 1837 is the mirror of the conflicts among developing national and political philosophy, different life styles. It’s a test for the people and leaders of the country. There were two armed uprisings of 1837 which took place in the lower and Upper Canada respectively. In the lower Canada which was ethnically heterogeneous, comprising both the French and English colonialists; the revolt was due to political ethno-exclusivity. The colonial administration treated the two factions with discrimination. It favored the English colonialists and neglected the voices of the French colonialists. However, in the Upper Canada, t...