Skip to main content

KNUT SECRETARY GENERAL PREPOSTEROUS


Sossion is Wrong
Sossions recent indiscreet rhapsody about digitization of the secondary school curriculum while trying to criticize cabinet secretary Fred Matiangi's strategy in the ministry of education, was uncalled for. Sossion who every time he opens his mouth sounds more of an aspiring politician than a public relations officer for teachers this time round made completely unreasonable remarks.
His remarks were absolutely preposterous. Claiming that prohibiting students to carry phones to school is in itself a form of incarceration and that the phones do not in any way abet cheating. Lying with all his teeth, either Sossion just wanted to make a rebellious statement to seek audience. To spurr controversy for the sake of fame. May be to endear him to the political environment ahead of 2017. In fact he has always hinted on his undying interest in mainstream politics. Not the politics of innuendos he plays in Knut.
It is sad that such unpalatable words were once indeed coming  from an experienced high cadre teacher. In this era of technology even an infant knows that the chief purpose of a phone is communication and sharing of information.
At what time will the students use their phones in school. Since according to their timetable there is no time for idling. It is advertently malicious for him to refute the fact that movement in and out of schools by non students provide an avenue for cheating material sharing. This guy who recently ratified a dubious agreement in which teachers were the losers as the Union officials once again loughed all the way to the bank. As the TSC promised to continue to furnish a now toothless Union with monthly deductions. Perhaps brown envelopes too ,to deliver the teachers voting block to the JAP party. Sossion should desist from striving to gain popularity by sabotaging CS Matiangi’s plans. For he who holds another down in the Mudd must himself stay down in the Mudd.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A FEW PICKS ABOUT VALENTINE AND BROKEN HEARTS.

I have been following on Valentine's day heartbreaking escapades of what sacrifices guys made for the sake of love, and am left in a reality limbo. The question that rings in my mind is is if indeed love exists? A man braced himself for a two year jail term sentence for an offence which was perpetrated by his lover. Sadly the girl who stole from her father a good amount of money went ahead to incriminate her husband after they had agreed the husband would come in to stand in for his wife in prison. By the time the guy was released from incarceration his love had left him. In a separate incidence a lady boycotted their wedding, broke a relationship two days to the wedding, fled and eloped with a white German man. It happened that two days to the wedding, one of the brides maid called the groom who was far from the wedding venue, telling him the wedding was bound not to be. The groom got concerned,,travelled down south to interrogate the issue one on one. When he found the bride,...

SAMANTHA THE PERFECT GIRL.

With the emergence of sex dolls for men, Samantha's, the striking difference in men and women interns of sex cannot be overemphasised. Sexuality of men and women are diametrically opposed to each other. Men want sex for physical satisfaction( in most cases) while women want sex for emotional satisfaction. Women give sex to men as a precious gift. A proof of submission and sacrifice. Women undoubtedly believe giving sex is the ultimate show of love. "A man can cheat on his woman and still love her but a woman cannot cheat on her man and still love him. I say this because while men do not have sex with emotions, women can't have sex without attaching emotions to it. This is the reason men simply need a place to have sex while women need a reason to have sex. Most women who take their husbands to court for divorce are those that cheat on their men. A non cheating woman would most likely never take her husband to court for divorce, unless the man exceedingly abuses her ph...

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada

The Reasons for the Rebellion of 1837 in Upper Canada INTRODUCTION There was neither big revolution nor dependence war in the history of Canada. The Rebellion of 1837 was the first and the only one revolt with certain scale, which occupies an important position in Canada history. In The Rising in French Canada 1837 , Joseph Schull indicates that the Rebellion of 1837 is the mirror of the conflicts among developing national and political philosophy, different life styles. It’s a test for the people and leaders of the country. There were two armed uprisings of 1837 which took place in the lower and Upper Canada respectively. In the lower Canada which was ethnically heterogeneous, comprising both the French and English colonialists; the revolt was due to political ethno-exclusivity. The colonial administration treated the two factions with discrimination. It favored the English colonialists and neglected the voices of the French colonialists. However, in the Upper Canada, t...